Phytoplankton abundance and composition are sensitive to water column conditions which are strongly influenced by weather (e.g., wind and rain) and climate change. The FRB-CESAB GEISHA project was framed in support to the GLEON Stormblitz project to gather and analyse time-series through collaborative efforts to assess the impacts of storms on phytoplankton. The project includes more than 80 researchers from governmental institutes and universities. GEISHA was, among others, able to:
- gather and standardize existing long-term datasets,
- assess the impact of storms on nutrients, light, water column stability and subsequent impacts on the structure of phytoplankton communities,
- perform meta-analyses to evaluate the sensitivity of aquatic ecosystems to extreme weather events, and
- highlight that biological consequences of storms on phytoplankton are fundamental to the dynamics of lakes and yet are still poorly understood. There is a real need for scientific collaboration to understand the impact of extreme weather events on lakes.
This document summarizes, in just a few pages, the project’s context and objectives, the methods and approaches used, the main findings, and the implications for science, society, and both public and private decision-making.
With climate change and the increasing water needs of human populations, many rivers, rich in biodiversity, are becoming intermittent. What is the influence of this phenomenon on the communities of animal and plant species living in these environments? The FRB-CESAB IRBAS team undertook to collect and analyze the relevant data to answer this question. Across the globe a large number of rivers periodically stop flowing. These rivers are called intermittent rivers. They are found in most terrestrial biomes, not only in arid zones, where they are relatively common. Studies show that over the next century, their numbers and size will increase in regions affected by droughts, notably caused by climate change. Intermittent rivers, however, have been little studied. Aquatic and terrestrial ecologists have long considered that they do not fall within their scope. It has also been assumed for some time that intermittent rivers harbored only a small amount of biodiversity and were inhabited only by poor communities of drought-resistant species. In recent years, ecological studies of intermittent rivers have developed, in part because of the severity of drying in areas where water requirements are being felt. Many countries now have data and metadata available on these intermittent rivers.
While these studies have led to the recognition that intermittent rivers need to be protected for their biological values, current management practices, intermittent river protection policies and legislation are often inadequate or non-existent. Effective management of intermittent river systems requires knowledge of the relationships between river flow components (e.g. drought periods, floods, base flow) and ecological responses.
This document summarizes, in just a few pages, the project’s context and objectives, the methods and approaches used, the main findings, and the implications for science, society, and both public and private decision-making.
